Legal Opinion

Blount v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

Before this court are preliminary objections filed by the Philadelphia Parking Authority (PPA) to the petition for review filed by Ronald Blount, individually and as president of the Taxi Worker’s Alliance of Pennsylvania,2 along with Michael Etemad, a Philadelphia business owner, several other corporations providing taxicab services, and a corporation providing radio dispatch services (hereinafter collectively referred to as Blount) against PPA.3 Because we *217once again conclude that PPA is a local agency, as opposed to a Commonwealth agency, we transfer this action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. E-Z Parks, Inc. v. LarsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. T & R Painting Co. v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. James J. Gory Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Scott v. ShapiroCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Ridgeway v. U.S. Life Credit Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API