Pizzi v. Nardello
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 9, Jan. T., 1904, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Ct., Oct. T., 1903, No. 38, affirming judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1902, No. 2911, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Enrico Pizzi v. Joseph Nardello. Appeal from Superior Court. Hrror assigned was the judgment of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Pizzi, the plaintiff, was engaged with two others, Frank and Ruhland, in work at certain houses in Philadelphia. For the work he did, stone masonry, Pizzi was to get forty-five cents per *2perch. They failed and the work stopped. Nardello who was surety on their contract had to take up the work and finish it; he wanted Pizzi’s help as a mason, and.said to him, “ Now Pizzi if you will go on with this work I will pay you what is coming to you for what you have already done, and I will pay you fifty cents a perch for what you do for me for the balance of the work.” Under this promise…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Maule v. BucknellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lieberman v. ColahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Philadelphia v. Rosin's Parking Lots, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Moon v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Klein v. RandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Rancil v. KrohneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906