Legal Opinion

Noland v. Noland's adm'r

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 1, 1876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Case 47 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT. • CITED 18 B. Mon. 671, Newland v. Gentry. 9 Bush, 666, Lawless v. Barger, &c. 2 Met. 551, Vanhussum v. Maloney. CITED Civil Code, section 579. 4 Dana, 429, Bustard v. Gates. 7 B. Mon. 62, Lampton v. Usher’s heirs. 8 B. Mon. 104, Benningfield v. Eeed. 18 B. Mon. 95, Anderson v. Anderson. 12 B. Mon. 472, Harrison v. Hord. 18 B. Mon. 281, Gossom v. Donaldson.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PRYOR

delitered the opinion of the court

A judgment was rendered in the court below for a sale of the land of James Noland, deceased, for the payment of debts. The action was instituted by the administrator, the *427land was sold, and Winn became the purchaser. The widow and children of the decedent, some of whom are infants, prosecute this appeal from the judgment of sale, from the order confirming the commissioner’s report of sale, and from the judgment dismissing the petition in equity styled a petition for a new trial. The purchaser of the land is made an appellee.

There is no sufficient…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blakey v. AbertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daniels v. LandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API