Legal Opinion

Naph-Sol Refining Co. v. Township of Muskegon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1956No. Docket 26, 27, Calendar 46,717, 46,718PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff corporation owns 2 separate parcels of land in Muskegon township, Muskegon county. On parcel 1 three dwelling houses and two 55,000-barrel gasoline storage tanks are located. On the other parcel plaintiff’s offices, its refining plant, a number of gasoline and crude-oil storage tanks, and other items common to an oil refining plant are located. In 1954 the assessing officer for the defendant township placed a valuation of $96,000 on said first parcel and $358,700 on the second parcel. Plaintiff appeared before the board of review for .the township and protested each assessment, “the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson Motor Car Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Moran v. Grosse Pointe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. S. S. Kresge Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Copper Range Co. v. Adams TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Harry B. Helmsley v. City of Detroit, Michigan, a Municipal Corporation of the State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Appeal of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Fisher-New Center Co. v. DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Lochmoor Club v. City of Grosse Pointe WoodsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API