Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Union Mercantile Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1902No. 1,432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District- Court, Leivis and Clarice County j 8. II. Mclniire, Judge. Action for wrongful attachment by Jerome D. Hayes against the Union Mercantile Company, Theodore Fuhrken, and Louis Hillebrecht. From a judgment against defendants Union Mercantile Company and Hillebrecht, they appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District- Court, Leivis and Clarice County j 8. II. Mclniire, Judge. Action for wrongful attachment by Jerome D. Hayes against the Union Mercantile Company, Theodore Fuhrken, and Louis Hillebrecht. From a judgment against defendants Union Mercantile Company and Hillebrecht, they appeal. Loss of credit through an attachment is too remote to be eon-¿ideordcL (Loicenstein v. Monroe, 7 N. W. 406, 55 la. 82; Campbell v. Chamberlain, 10 la. 337; Mitchell v. Harcourt, 17 N. W. 581, 02 la. 349; Anderson v. Sloan, 72 Wis. 566, 40 N. W. 214; Cunningham v. Sugar, 49 Pac. 910; Crymble v.…

1Opinion of the Court

MR-. JUSTICE MILBURN

delivered the opinion of the

court.

This cause comes before us on appeal from the order denying a motion for a new trial and from the judgment.

The respondent has interposed a motion to' dismiss the appeal. The action was prosecuted by the plaintiff against the three defendants named, to recover for tort. The verdict was against all three of the defendants for $3,000. Judgment was taken and entered against the Union Mercantile Company and Louis Hillebrecht only, the court holding Fuhrken not liable. Two notices of intention to move for a new trial were served and filed, — one…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brand v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Closson v. StaplesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  3. Filer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Anderson v. SloaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Flournoy & Epping v. Lyon & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brault v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Spokane Ranch & Water Co. v. BeattyMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Plymouth Gold Mining Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Sayre v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API