Dal-Bac (Pty.), Ltd. v. Firma Astorwerk Otto Berning & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendants (styled a “cross motion”) to dismiss the action as to defendant Approved Accessories, Inc. because “it is not a patentee nor a licensee of the patent in suit.” (moving memorandum, page 1).
There is no affidavit in support of the motion, which would suggest that the motion is on the face of the complaint. On the other hand, there is a reference in the moving memorandum to “Defendants’ Exhibits 1 and 2” which seems to be a reference to papers submitted on another motion.
Although it is not clear from the moving papers, this motion is presumably…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Telechron, Inc. v. ParissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Ostow & Jacobs, Inc. v. Morgan-Jones, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Utah Radio Products Co. v. BoudetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brame v. Ray Bills Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Sweeney v. AbramovitzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- Blessings Corporation v. AltmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Electro Medical Systems, Inc. v. Medical Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1975