Legal Opinion

Cook, Comm. of Revenues v. Wofford, Chancellor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1946No. 4-7879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.

The Coca-Cola Bottling Company, hereinafter referred to as the Company, is a domestic corporation with its principal place of business in the city of Ft. Smith. Pursuant to the requirements of the 1929 income tax act (Act 118 of the Acts of 1929, p. 573 et seq.) the Company filed its income tax return for the year 1943, and paid the taxes shown to be due on said return. In 1945, the Commissioner of Revenues made an examination and audit of said return and on October 19, 1945, issued to the Company a deficiency letter setting up a deficiency of $4,974.59 in the payment of taxes due by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McLeod v. the Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Burr's Administrator v. HatterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Moses v. McLeod, Comm. of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cheney v. East Texas Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Cheney v. Murphy Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Cook, Comm. of Revenues v. Coca-Cola BottlingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Georgia Pacific Corp. v. LarrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API