Ex parte State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceBurke, Judge
The majority grants the State’s petition for a writ of mandamus and, in doing so, holds that Alabama’s capital-sentencing scheme is constitutional under Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). Although I agree with the rationale employed by the majority regarding the constitutional issue, I would not reach the constitutional issue because, in my view, the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to rule on that issue. Therefore, I concur in the result.
In J.L.N. v. State, 894 So.2d 751, 753-54 (Ala.2004), the Alabama Supreme Court held:
“ ‘Not all…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.