Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex parte State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 17, 2016No. CR-15-0619, CR-15-0622, CR-15-0623 and CR-15-0624Published

1ConcurrenceBurke, Judge

The majority grants the State’s petition for a writ of mandamus and, in doing so, holds that Alabama’s capital-sentencing scheme is constitutional under Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). Although I agree with the rationale employed by the majority regarding the constitutional issue, I would not reach the constitutional issue because, in my view, the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to rule on that issue. Therefore, I concur in the result.

In J.L.N. v. State, 894 So.2d 751, 753-54 (Ala.2004), the Alabama Supreme Court held:

“ ‘Not all…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API