Norman v. Winch
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Monona District Court. This is an action at law. It was originally commenced by A. J. Norman and Lucinda M. Norinan, as plaintiffs. A motion was made by defendant attacking the petition. The motion was sustained.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Monona District Court. This is an action at law. It was originally commenced by A. J. Norman and Lucinda M. Norinan, as plaintiffs. A motion was made by defendant attacking the petition. The motion was sustained. Thereupon A. J. Norman dismissed the action as to himself, and the present plaintiff, Lucinda M. Norman, filed a new petition, in which she sought to recover of the defendant the sum of $25 for failure to enter satisfaction of a certain mortgage, and she also claimed that she was entitled to recover damages of the defendant for a breach of the covenant of seizin in a…
1Opinion of the Court
Rothrock, Ch. J.
I. Complaint is made because the court *264rendered a judgment against A. J. Norman for costs. The record does not show that a judgment was rendered against him; and it does not appear that he appeals. We ought not to be called upon to presume that a judgment was rendered against a person not a party to the action.
II. It appears that on the twenty-sixth day of June, 1873, William N. Perry conveyed the land in controversy by a deed of general warranty to one La Soward. La Soward conveyed to Winch by deed of general warranty on the fourth day of January, 1877, and Winch conveyed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watson v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Hudspeth v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Nosler v. HuntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
3Cited by8 opinions
- McNair v. SockriterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- McClure v. DeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Foshay v. ShaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Williams v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Boardman v. WillardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.