Nathanson v. Tri-State Constr. LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), *374entered February 14, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiff Nathanson’s motion to amend the complaint to add Vaij Associates as a defendant, to consolidate this case with another pending matter, and to impose a constructive trust on the proposed new defendant, affirmed, without costs.
Nathanson failed to demonstrate merit to the proposed amendment (Helene-Harrisson Corp. v Moneyline Networks, 6 AD3d 151 [2004]). In light of our recent affirmance of the dismissal of the case with which Nathanson sought…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bell v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Helene-Harrisson Corp. v. Moneyline Networks, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Tri State Construction, LLC v. Vaij Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- Altschuler v. Jobman 478/480, LLC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Charles v. SuvannavejhNew York Supreme Court · 2009