Legal Opinion

People v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court’s determination that he established a relationship with the victim for the purpose of victimization is supported by the requisite clear and convincing evidence (see § 168-n [3]). “The guidelines assess 20 points if the offender’s crime . . . was directed at ... a person with whom a relationship had been established . . . for the primary purpose of victimization” (Sex Offender…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CarltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. BirchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. GiffordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. GIFFORD, DONALD E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API