Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Holzmark
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 5, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
* [EDITORS' NOTE: FOOTNOTE * IS OMITTED FROM THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT, THEREFORE IT IS NOT DISPLAYED IN THE ONLINE VERSION.]
1. — Pleading. In action for breach of contract to procure theft insurance on automobile, answer alleging contract was without consideration held to waive any defect in petition for failure to allege consideration.
2. — Same. Petition in action for breach of contract to procure theft insurance on automobile held sufficient on appeal to allege consideration was purchase of automobile.
3. — Frauds, Statute of. Recovery for breach of oral agreement to procure theft…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Indiana Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Shuttlefield v. NeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Savarese v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
- Webber v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Swift v. Central Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zeff Distributing Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Gould v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. Utilities Building Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936