Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 18, 1988No. 6427Published

1Per curiam

This appeal implicates the fact finding function of the trial court and challenges the law making powers of the legislature.

Our review of the record and transcript discloses that there was sufficient evidence introduced by the state to support a conviction of the defendant for a violation of General Statutes § 14-219 (c) (Speeding).

Further, the defendant’s claim that he was entitled to a jury trial for said violation is without merit. See General Statutes § 54-82b (a); State v. Weisser, 9 Conn. App. 255, 258, 518 A.2d 655 (1986), cert. denied, 202 Conn. 803, 519 A.2d 1207 (1987); State v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WeisserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. State v. SheldonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API