Legal Opinion

United States v. Verduzco-Martinez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1999No. 98-8099PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Jose Aurelio Verduzco-Martinez (Ver-duzco-Martinez) appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute methamphetamine and attempt to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) and 21…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Spears v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. John Vincent MacKovichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. TraversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API