Legal Opinion

Guise v. Early

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 29, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Sao District Court. Action in chancery to declare void and set aside certain tax deeds, and to recover the land held thereunder, and the value of the rents while it was in possession of defendants. The tax deed was declared void in the final decree of the court, and a judgment was entered against plaintiffs for the amount of the taxes paid on the land by defendants, "vyith interest, costs and penalties, as in case of redemption from tax sales. Both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

1. tax sale and deed: validity: action to set co very of" taxes paid. I. Plaintiffs claim the title of the land under the patent title, and defendants claim under tax sales and

deeds. The tax title was held void by the dis- . . tnct court, and a ludgment was entered against % ° 0 plaintiff for the amount of taxes paid by defendants, with interest, costs and penalties, as in case of redemption from a tax sale. Certain questions involving the validity of the tax titles, and the right of defendants to recover the taxes paid by them, with penalties, which arose in Barke v. Early, ante, 273, are…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fidelity Investment Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Guthrie v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Hunter v. EarlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API