Legal Opinion

People v. Bounds

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1985No. B001788PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Facts and Proceedings Below*

I.-IV.*

V. Although the Trial Court Erred in Instructing the Jury on the Attempted Murder Count, the Error Was Harmless

1. The Trial Court Erred by Giving Conflicting Instructions to the Jury.

Bounds argues the trial court erred in instructing the jury regarding proof of the crime of attempted murder since these instructions included *806reference to the concept of implied malice. Bounds argues this error was prejudicial.

“In instructing upon the crime of attempt to commit murder, there should never be any reference whatsoever to implied malice. Nothing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. BoundsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API