Legal Opinion

Laurence v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 31, 1932No. 3526Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

Merchandise, consisting of crin vegetal and esparto grass, imported in bales, each bale being bound with esparto grass twisted into the form of rope, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of Los Angeles at three-fourths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 1001 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

Par. 1001. Plax straw, $2 per ton; flax, not hackled, 1 cent per pound; flax, hackled, including “dressed line,” 2 cents per pound; flax tow and flax noils, crin vegetal, or palm-leaf fiber, twisted or not twisted, three-fourths…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shallus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Baker Castor Oil Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API