Legal Opinion

Wolf Low v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 22, 1968No. 21499PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge:

The appellant, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada of violation of § 545 of Title 18, United States Code. The section makes criminal the receiving, concealment and facilitation of the transportation and concealment of merchandise — in this case watch movements — unlawfully imported into the United States. The trial was by court sitting without a jury.

*62In anticipation of the trial, the defendant made a motion to suppress the watch movements, which the prosecution had in its possession and intended to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. United States v. CulverDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  4. United States v. FrankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. John CapraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Richard Norton Sherwin, Dba Marquis Publishing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Dennis E. PrybaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. William Echols, A/K/A Steve PageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. David Douglas OgdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API