Legal Opinion

Miranda v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered January 8, 1998, which granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although defendant Transit Authority urges that it has been prejudiced by plaintiff’s delay in filing a notice of claim and that plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim should have been denied, accident reports prepared by the bus driver and a supervisor immediately after the subject accident, documenting the circumstances of plaintiff’s injury, provided *200defendant with timely…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Schiffman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Matter of Cruz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Johnson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API