In Re Duncan
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE COMPLAINT OBJECTING TO DISCHARGE
KAREN M. SEE, Bankruptcy Judge.
Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 4004(b) and FRCP 60(a), movants C. Gaither Spra-dling, et al. filed an untimely motion for extension of time to file a complaint objecting to discharge. Debtors objected to the motion. The primary issue is whether due process requires that movants receive actual notice of the bar date for filing a complaint objecting to discharge where the movants had actual knowledge of the bankruptcy case. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lawrence Tractor Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Reliable Electric Co., Inc. v. Olson Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- In Re William M. ALTON, Debtor, Bronson F. BYRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William A. ALTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Stanley L. Neeley v. Clinton W. Murchison, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re GuzmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1991
- First Bank System, N.A. v. Begue (In Re Begue)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- In Re WalkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- In Re MarinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- In Re MusgravesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.