Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lemme

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County

Decided August 25, 1950No. 94Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mook, P. J.,

Petitioner, along with three associates, was arrested for soliciting subscriptions for magazines within the confines of the City of Meadville without a license as required by an ordinance of the city, known as city ordinance no. 2066 “defining and regulating the business of Peddlers, Hucksters, Hawkers, Manufacturer’s Agents, Soliciting Agents or Solicitors; requiring the securing of a license therefor, imposing certain license fees thereon and providing penalties for the violation of any provision of this ordinance”.

*276A hearing was held before respondent, who was at that time the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API