Legal Opinion

State v. Mobbs

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 9, 1999No. 98-333PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Scott Mobbs appeals his conviction of taking a moose in closed season in violation of 10 VS.A. App. § 31(f). On appeal from Chittenden District Court defendant argues (1) the court erred in not requiring the State to prove specific intent to take a moose as an element of the offense, and (2) the statute is void for vagueness. We affirm.

On October 12, 1997, defendant was bow hunting for deer in the Richmond area. While in the woods, defendant heard a noise, looked up, and glimpsed what he thought was a deer. From approximately twenty-five yards, defendant shot his arrow hitting the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SidwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. State v. MottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Brody v. BaraschSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StanleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API