Legal Opinion
Withers v. Eharmony, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 22, 2010No. CV 09-2266-GHK (RCx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
ROSALYN H. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On February 3, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice of motion and motion for a protective order, a joint stipulation and the supporting declaration of Michael D. McLaehlan with exhibits, and defendant filed the opposing declaration of James P. Fogelman with exhibits. Neither party filed a supplemental memorandum. This matter is decided in Chambers, without oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 7-15.
BACKGROUND
I
On January 30, 2009, plaintiff Mellissa Withers filed her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Sidney Clark and Julia Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dysthe v. Basic Research, L.L.C.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Rounds v. The Board of Trustees of the California State UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Walker v. Bekaert CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022