Legal Opinion
Hall v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 30, 1930No. 6 Div. 773PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The Court of Appeals dismissed the state’s application for rehearing because of a failure to comply with Rule 38, Supreme Court Practice. Code 1923, vol. 4, p. 891.
f Whether or not the rule should be applied and enforced in the particular case to which the rule applies was a matter addressed to the irrevisable discretion of the Court of Appeals. Caraway v. State, 207 Ala. 588, 93 So. 548; Brewington v. State, 19 Ala. App. 409, 97 So. 763.
Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brewington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Caraway v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilkerson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Melvin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MagouirkAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
- Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MagouirkAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942