Legal Opinion · Dissent

Our Lady of the Rockies, Inc. v. Peterson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2008No. 05-057Published

1DissentJustice Morris

¶101 The Court’s decision reaches a result at odds with the practical realities of the history of property ownership in Montana, particularly with respect to the location and patenting of mining claims in and around Butte. I dissent.

¶ 102 Courts in construing a statute “may with propriety recur to the history of the times when it was passed ...” in order to ascertain the reason for a particular provision. Leo Sheep Co. v. United States, 440 U.S. 668, 669, 99 S. Ct. 1403, 1405 (1979). The Court would be well advised to examine the development of the Road at issue in light of the history…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Sierra Club v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Leo Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API