Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chester Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Bank One, N.A., 2005-G-2660 (6-29-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2007No. 2005-G-2660Published

1Dissent

{¶ 82} For the reasons that follow, I agree with the sound and well-reasoned decision of the trial court and would affirm. Based upon the undisputed facts in this case, there are no genuine issues of material fact, and Bank One is entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to the entire claim of the trustees.

{¶ 83} It is undisputed that, during the entire period of the township clerk, Michael Spellman's, thefts, i.e., from August 1996 until January 2003, Bank One contemporaneously provided to the township trustees monthly statements along with the cancelled checks bearing the trustees' forged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mueller v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API