Legal Opinion

Keystone Type Foundry v. National Compositype Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1912No. 1,045Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland.

1Per curiam

It appears that the appellant, the plaintiff below, is manufacturing and selling a certain kind of type of alleged new and original faces which it calls “Caslon Bold” ; that the appellee, the defendant below, is manufacturing a machine with which to cast and make type, which it calls the “Automatic Type Caster,” which it designs to sell to the printers of the country for the purpose of casting their own type. It is apparent that the elements of fraud and deception to be practiced upon the purchaser or consumer, essential to the maintenance of a bill like this for unfair competition, as set…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Allen Bros. Tobacco Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API