Legal Opinion

Tedder v. Farrell Lines, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 8, 1958Published

1Per curiam

The evidence was sufficient to support a finding that the plaintiff sustained an injury aboard ship while in the defendant’s employ. The court was justified in ruling that the plaintiff’s right to maintenance and cure did not end when he was signed off at San Pedro, California. The plaintiff is also entitled to interest on the amount ultimately awarded, from the date it became due (Civ. Prac. Act, § 480; Greater New York Coal & Oil Corp. v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 278 N. Y. 270; Pederseon v. Fitzgerald Constr. Co., 293 N. Y. 126; Brown v. Godefroy Mfg. Co., 278 App. Div. 242;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jose A. Perez, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. Suwanee Steamship Co., and Orion Shipping & Trading Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Brown v. Godefroy Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Greater New York Coal & Oil Corp. v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Pedersen v. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API