Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Butler

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demurrers to complaints.

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

To say of these complaints that they state a canse of action means that a second arrest of one believed by the prosecution to be guilty of a crime is unlawful where the accused has theretofore been discharged on habeas corpus upon the ground that the information upon which the former arrest was made “ did not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime.” The words just quoted are taken from the complaints now demurred to, and are there alleged as the reasons *252for the discharge on habeas corpus from the first arrest. A-second arrest for the same crime is not illegal where the first has fallen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hirshbach v. KetchumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Hinds v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Grant v. DohertyNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Sutton v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API