Legal Opinion
Searl v. Earll
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 1948No. 646PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
The plaintiff below sued for the. unpaid balance of $1,564.58 and interest on an unsecured promissory note of $2,000, signed by defendants August 14, 1943. He was met with the defense of usury and a counterclaim of $3,000 for alleged breach of faith while he acted as defendants’ agent. The trial judge in a memorandum opinion found that the evidence did not support the defendants’ claim of usury and gave judgment for plaintiff in the full amount requested; and also found for plaintiff on defendants’ counterclaim. Defendants on this appeal assign as error the alleged…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Condit v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Consumers Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- New England Mortgage Security Co. v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Fowler v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Everett A. R. Searl, Pearl A. Searl v. Donald M. EarllCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- MONTGOMERY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'N v. BaerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Earll v. SearlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953