St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Young, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
It is understood, from statements made before the court at the time of the argument of this cause, that no objection has been made as to the propriety of the form of the action resorted to as a means of securing a determination of the matter in controversy, and therefore we do not consider it.
In the year 1881 the defendant McDonald, the auditor of Henne-pin county, caused the tract of land to which the issue relates to be assessed for taxation, and the ordinary proceedings to impose taxes *184upon the land for that year were being carried forward when this action was instituted to restrain such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
3Cited by5 opinions
- Elsenpeter v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- County of Chippewa v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Sioux City & St. Paul Railroad v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Chauncey v. WassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885