Legal Opinion

Rupert v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1969No. 6 Div. 449PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

These appellants were charged by indictment with the crime of larceny, specifically, with the theft of a “Shaw-Walker Safe of the value of two hundred forty-two and no/100 dollars, the personal property of The Housing Authority of the City of Fayette, Alabama, a Corporation.”

We are of opinion the State’s evidence conclusively established the guilt of the defendants. The defendants presented no testimony.

Counsel argues in brief that the State failed to establish the ownership of the property alleged to have been stolen and to prove its value.

On the question of ownership…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Helms v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. House v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. McCall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API