United States v. Cano Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion
The decretal order, dated July 27, 1926, was final in character. No written motion for an appeal was filed by the defendants or either of them within twenty days from the date of that order, as by statute was essential to the bringing of the case to this Court for review. G.L. 1561; Gove v. Gove's Admr.,87 Vt. 468, 89 A. 868; Bragg v. Newton, 98 Vt. 102,126 A. 494. The case is therefore not here, but remains in the court of chancery. Ludlow Savings Bank Trust Co. v. Knight, 91 Vt. 172,99 A. 633. As this appears on the face of the papers, we dismiss the exceptions on our own motion. Page v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Page v. Page's AdministratorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Gove v. Gove's Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- Ludlow Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Bragg v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Jones v. StearnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922