Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Criminal action upon an information for buying and receiving stolen property, in District Court, Mountrail County, Leighton, J. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant lias appealed. On trial of an indictment for receiving stolen goods tbe ownership ■of the goods, if known, must be alleged and proved as alleged.

Read the full summary

Criminal action upon an information for buying and receiving stolen property, in District Court, Mountrail County, Leighton, J. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant lias appealed. On trial of an indictment for receiving stolen goods tbe ownership ■of the goods, if known, must be alleged and proved as alleged. Miller v. People (Colo.) 21 Pae. 1025; State v. McAloon, 40 Me. 134; Com. v. Finn, 108 Mass. 466; State v. Williams, 2 Strobh. 229; State v. Palk (Mo.) 79 S. W. 980; Arcia v. State (Tex.) 12 S. W. 599; Brothers v. State (Tex.) 3 S. W. 737; Kirby v. United States, 174 U. S. 47, 43…

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

The defendant was convicted upon an information charging him with buying and receiving certain stolen meat and pork. He has appealed from the judgment of conviction. The evidence has not been sent to this court. The defendant demurred to the informa*169tion and made a motion in arrest of judgment. The body of the information charges the commission of a crime as follows:

“That at said time and place the said Sam Eoss did knowingly and feloniously buy and receive certain stolen property, to wit, two hind quarters and one front quarter of dressed stag beef fresh weighing about 75 pounds each, and one…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. . WeldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. State v. RichmondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. State v. GuildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Jenkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. MarcovitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. McCartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. LennickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API