Hass v. Pettingill
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Aureal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in the Municipal Court, eighth district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.
This action was brought to recover for the agreed price of a suit, consisting of a coat and skirt, made by the plaintiffs for the wife of the defendant.
The testimony presents merely a question of fact, and there is *319ample proof to sustain the conclusion reached by the court below. It appears that on December 5, 1898, the defendant’s wife called at the store of the plaintiffs and ordered a suit to be made for herself. The materials were selected, the price agreed upon at ninety dollars, and a measurement taken. The order as originally given was that payment should be made upon delivery of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunter v. . WetsellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- McGean v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Geneva & W. Ry. Co. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.New York Supreme Court · 1895