Legal Opinion

Atlantic Casualty Insurance v. Oregon Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 13, 2007No. 33733-9-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 This case presents a narrow legal question about whether the trial court should have granted summary judgment under the priority of action rule. Oregon Mutual Insurance Company (OMI) filed a garnishment action seeking to establish that Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company’s (Atlantic) insurance policy covered Starkweather Roofing. Eight months after OMI filed the writ of garnishment, Atlantic filed a declaratory judgment seeking to establish that Atlantic did not have to pay under its policy. OMI moved to dismiss the declaratory judgment action, arguing that the garnishment action would…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ensley v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Berschauer Phillips Construction Co. v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Ensley v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Frank Coluccio Construction Company v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Berschauer Philips Construction Co. v. Mutual Of Enumclaw Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API