Legal Opinion
Mauro v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 7, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination of respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), dated September 14, 1995, which found that petitioners engaged in a course of conduct constituting harassment and assessed civil penalties totaling $33,000, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Marylin Diamond, J.], entered April 16, 1997) dismissed, without costs.
The combination of investigatory, prosecutory and quasi-judicial functions in a single administrative agency is not in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Warder v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Cruz v. LavineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Jeremias v. SanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dunlop Development Corp. v. SpitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Przydatek v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Meyers v. MintzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012