Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Hicklin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 27, 1938No. 14694PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice Wm. H. Grimbarr.

This appeal involves the construction of a contract between M. D. Hicklin, one of the respondents above named, and State Earm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appellant above named.

This identical contract was before this Court in the case of Hicklin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 176 S. C., 504, 180 S. E., 666, and one phase of the contract was construed in that case. A different phase of the contract now comes here for construction.

The present case arises in the following manner:

On…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicklin v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vyn v. Northwest Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API