Legal Opinion
Ninoska Suate-Orellana v. Merrick Garland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 2024No. 19-72446PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NINOSKA SUATE-ORELLANA, No. 19-72446 AKA Ninosca Suate Oriana, Agency No. Petitioner, A200-965-308 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted December 8, 2023 Portland, Oregon Filed May 7, 2024 Before: Marsha S. Berzon, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Eric D. Miller, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Nguyen 2 SUATE-ORELLANA V. GARLAND SUMMARY * Immigration The panel granted Ninoska Suate-Orellana’s petition for review of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rene Lemus-Escobar v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Angel Didier Deagueros Mota v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Raymundo Meza Medina v. Todd BlancheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
- Rene Lemus-Escobar v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Santos v. BlancheCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.