Pike v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by a jury for engaging in organized criminal activity by unlawful manufacture and delivery of methamphetamine, aggravated. The jury set punishment at 99 years confinement and $15,000.00 fine for both cases. The convictions were affirmed on appeal. Pike v. State, 758 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.App.—Waco 1988). Appellant filed one petition for discretionary review in which he raised three *131grounds for review that pertain to both cases.
In his second ground for review, appellant contends that the Court of Appeals erred in…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Durrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Pike v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1988
4Cited by13 opinions
- Longoria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
- McLaren v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
- Zule v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.