Legal Opinion

Pike v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1989No. 1325-88, 1326-88PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted by a jury for engaging in organized criminal activity by unlawful manufacture and delivery of methamphetamine, aggravated. The jury set punishment at 99 years confinement and $15,000.00 fine for both cases. The convictions were affirmed on appeal. Pike v. State, 758 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.App.—Waco 1988). Appellant filed one petition for discretionary review in which he raised three *131grounds for review that pertain to both cases.

In his second ground for review, appellant contends that the Court of Appeals erred in…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Durrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Pike v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1988

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Longoria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  3. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
  4. McLaren v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
  5. Zule v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API