Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard A. Rosen, Robert Esson Rew and David Benton Holmes

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 1, 1985No. 84-5220PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants Rosen, Rew and Holmes were convicted of various charges involving conspiracy, attempt, and importation relating to the smuggling of marijuana to the United States from Jamaica. On appeal defendants claim (1) insufficiency of the evidence; (2) inconsistency of the evidence with the charges in the indictment; and (3) erroneous sentencing in that the statutory maximum sentence for importation or attempted importation was exceeded. We affirm the convictions but hold the statutory maximum sentences were exceeded, which the Government does not contest, and remand to the district court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Edison JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Stanford Champion, Gene Slusser, Eldon L. Morgan, Jr., Lester Spainhoward, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Hector Martinez, Jorge Gomez, Humberto GalloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Steven A. Silvers, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API