Legal Opinion

Kucera v. Hansen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1914No. 17,723PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Cuming county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

From a judgment of the district court for Cuming county, in favor of plaintiff in a proceeding under the bastardy statute, defendant appeals.

The brief filed by defendant contains no formal assignments of error, nor are the subdivisions of the discussion in the brief even numbered. It is therefore not entitled to be considered, except on the point that the evidence is insufficient. We have made an examination of the record and have been unable to discover any prejudicial error. While some of the evidence offered by plaintiff seems somewhat unreasonable, and different statements made by her are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Denham v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. M. A. D. v. P. R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Clarke v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Mad v. PrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API