Legal Opinion

Bloomfield Sav. Bank v. Howard S. Stainton and Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 5, 1960PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 N.J. Super. 524 (1960)

159 A.2d 443

BLOOMFIELD SAVINGS BANK, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

HOWARD S. STAINTON AND CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND HOWARD S. STAINTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 22, 1960.

Decided April 5, 1960.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and FOLEY.

Mr. Joel A. Mott, Jr., argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. French B. Loveland, attorney).

Mr. Harold J. Brown argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Joyce and Brown, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tiernan v. Carasaljo PinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Century Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Van GlahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Weinstein v. Investors Savings and Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Dugan v. GrzybowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Shalit v. Investors Savings & Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Norwest Bank Minnesota v. Blair Road Associates, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API