Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1992No. SC S38746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioner is an elector who timely submitted written comments addressed to the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. Therefore, he is entitled to petition this court seeking a different title. ORS 250.085(2).

The Attorney General certified this ballot title to the Secretary of State:

“RESTRICTS LOWER COLUMBIA FISH HARVESTS TO MOST SELECTIVE MEANS AVAILABLE
“QUESTION: Shall state law restrict lower Columbia River fishing to most selective means available, to allow release of nontargeted fish…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCain v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Nichols v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API