Legal Opinion

Dawson v. . Ennett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Guión, J., November Term, 1909, of GraveN. Civil action, beard on demurrer to complaint. There was judgment sustaining the demurrer, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtTIoke, J.

The plaintiff, having acquired and holding the estate and interest of Marietta O’Leary in a certain piece of land in said county, bargained the same to defendant at the contract price of $400 and agreed to convey a good title. Defendant having failed to pay, the present action was instituted to recover the purchase price, and defendant resisted recovery, assigning for cause that the title offered was not a good one.

The title of plaintiff was averred to depend upon the estate and interest taken by Marietta O’Leary, as devisee, under the will of ’William Daniel O’Leary, deceased; and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Buchanan v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Sessoms v. . SessomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Harrell v. . HaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Smith v. . BrissonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Elmore v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Rees v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Smith v. Ellington-Guy Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Perrett v. . BirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API