Legal Opinion

Clements v. Corbin

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 8, 1994No. 13-93-222-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Dalton Ray Clements appeals a take-nothing judgment on his claim of adverse possession of approximately 80 acres in La Ward. Clements claims that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for judgment non obstante veredicto because he established all of the elements of adverse possession as a matter of law, or alternatively that the jury’s verdict is against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. Additionally, Clements contends that the award of attorney’s fees to the plaintiff below is excessive. We affirm.

This trespass to try title suit was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Stone v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Dreiss, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. Bauer v. Jasso, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  3. Teon Management, LLC v. TURQUOISE BAY CORP., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
  4. Musquiz v. Marroquin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  5. Garza v. Maddux, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API