Legal Opinion

Cuchine v. H.O. Bell, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1984No. 83-443PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Timothy Cuchine appeals from a summary judgment of the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, in favor of Ford Motor Credit Company.

On October 15, 1980, Timothy Cuchine purchased a pickup from H. O. Bell, Inc. under a retail installment sales contract which was subsequently assigned to Ford Motor Credit Company. Cuchine later began experiencing difficulties with the pickup and returned it to H. O. Bell to be repaired. When it became apparent that the truck could not be adequately repaired, Cuchine left the truck with H. O. Bell and filed a suit against H. O. Bell and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michelin Tires (Canada) Ltd. v. First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  2. Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Apple v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Thompson v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lawson State Community College v. First Continental Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. H. John Homan Co. v. Wilkes-BarreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Lydig Construction, Inc. v. Rainier National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Chamberlain v. Golds GymUtah Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API