KCP Hastings, LLC v. Cnty. of Dakota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Justice.
In 2015, we remanded this case to the Minnesota Tax Court after concluding that the court's valuation of relator KCP Hastings, LLC's shopping mall was not reasonably supported by the record. KCP Hastings, LLC v. County of Dakota , 868 N.W.2d 268, 276 (Minn. 2015). Following the remand, the tax court received further evidence from the parties and ultimately reached a new valuation for KCP's property. KCP again appeals, arguing the tax court committed several errors that resulted in a valuation of its property that is not supported by the record. We conclude that the tax court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Continental Retail, LLC v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Eden Prairie Mall, LLC v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Humana MarketPoint, Inc., Relator, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025