Legal Opinion

National Glass Co. v. United States Glass Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1906No. 34Published

In Equity. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.1

The subject of suit is a device for the fire-finishing or glazing of glassware, particularly tumblers. As they come from the mould, these articles look dull and greasy, and are sometimes marred or pitted with imperfections. The edges also are rough and sharp. To remedy this, they are subjected to a process known as “reheating,” “fire-finishing,” or “glazing,” by which by the melting of the surface exterior marks are removed, a luster imparted, and the rims or edges are melted down and rounded. By the hand method which was in vogue at the date of the patents in suit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Bryce Bros. v. National Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API