Legal Opinion

Republic of Hawaii v. Clark

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal erom District Court oe HONOLULU.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WHITING, J.

Tbe defendant was charged with tbe offense of being found armed with a deadly weapon, to-wit, a pistol, without being by law authorized so to be armed, violating Chapter 54, Sec. 1, Penal Code.

Tbis chapter is to prevent tbe carrying of deadly weapons, and provides as follows: Sec. 1. “Any person not authorized by laxo, who shall carry or be found armed with, any bowie-knife, sword-cane, pistol, air-gun, slung-sbot, or other deadly *586weapon, shall be liable to' a fine of no more than thirty dollars, and no less than ten dollars, or in default ***** by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KawazoyeHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API